{"title": {"order":1,"value-regex":".{0,500}","description":"Brief summary of your review.","required":true },"review": {"order":2,"value-regex":"[\\S\\s]{1,200000}", "description": "Please provide an evaluation of the quality, clarity, originality and significance of this work, including a list of its pros and cons (max 200000 characters). Add formatting using Markdown and formulas using LaTeX. For more information see https://openreview.net/faq",
"required":true,"markdown":true },"rating": {"order":3,"value-dropdown": ["10: Top 5% of accepted papers, seminal paper","9: Top 15% of accepted papers, strong accept","8: Top 50% of accepted papers, clear accept","7: Good paper, accept","6: Marginally above acceptance threshold","5: Marginally below acceptance threshold","4: Ok but not good enough - rejection","3: Clear rejection","2: Strong rejection","1: Trivial or wrong" ],"required":true },"confidence": {"order":4,"value-radio": [ "5: The reviewer is absolutely certain that the evaluation is correct and very familiar with the relevant literature",
"4: The reviewer is confident but not absolutely certain that the evaluation is correct","3: The reviewer is fairly confident that the evaluation is correct", "2: The reviewer is willing to defend the evaluation, but it is quite likely that the reviewer did not understand central parts of the paper",
"1: The reviewer's evaluation is an educated guess" ],"required":true }}
API V2 JSON
{"title": {"value":"param": {"type":"string","regex":".{0,500}" } },"order":1,"description":"Brief summary of your review." },"review": {"value": {"param": {"type":"string","regex":"[\\S\\s]{1,200000}","markdown":true } },"order":2, "description": "Please provide an evaluation of the quality, clarity, originality and significance of this work, including a list of its pros and cons (max 200000 characters). Add formatting using Markdown and formulas using LaTeX. For more information see https://openreview.net/faq"
},"rating": {"value": {"param": {"type":"string","enum": ["10: Top 5% of accepted papers, seminal paper","9: Top 15% of accepted papers, strong accept","8: Top 50% of accepted papers, clear accept","7: Good paper, accept","6: Marginally above acceptance threshold","5: Marginally below acceptance threshold","4: Ok but not good enough - rejection","3: Clear rejection","2: Strong rejection","1: Trivial or wrong" ],"input":"select" } },"order":3, },"confidence": {"value": {"param": {"type":"string","enum": [ "5: The reviewer is absolutely certain that the evaluation is correct and very familiar with the relevant literature",
"4: The reviewer is confident but not absolutely certain that the evaluation is correct","3: The reviewer is fairly confident that the evaluation is correct", "2: The reviewer is willing to defend the evaluation, but it is quite likely that the reviewer did not understand central parts of the paper",
"1: The reviewer's evaluation is an educated guess" ],"input":"radio" } },"order":4 }}