# Default Review Form

#### API V2 JSON

```json
 {
  "title": {
    "value": {
      "param": {
        "type": "string",
        "regex": ".{0,500}"
      }
    },
    "order": 1,
    "description": "Brief summary of your review."
  },
  "review": {
    "value": {
      "param": {
        "type": "string",
        "minLength": 1,
        "maxLength": 20000,
        "input": "textarea",
        "markdown": true
      }
    },  
    "order": 2,
    "description": "Please provide an evaluation of the quality, clarity, originality and significance of this work, including a list of its pros and cons (max 200000 characters). Add formatting using Markdown and formulas using LaTeX. For more information see https://openreview.net/faq"
  },
  "rating": {
    "value": {
      "param": {
        "type": "integer",
        "enum": [
            { "value": 10, "description": "10: Top 5% of accepted papers, seminal paper" },
            { "value": 9, "description": "9: Top 15% of accepted papers, strong accept" },
            { "value": 8, "description": "8: Top 50% of accepted papers, clear accept" },
            { "value": 7, "description": "7: Good paper, accept" },
            { "value": 6, "description": "6: Marginally above acceptance threshold" },
            { "value": 5, "description": "5: Marginally below acceptance threshold" },
            { "value": 4, "description": "4: Ok but not good enough - rejection" },
            { "value": 3, "description": "3: Clear rejection" },
            { "value": 2, "description": "2: Strong rejection" },
            { "value": 1, "description": "1: Trivial or wrong" }
           ],
        "input": "select"
      }
    },
    "order": 3
  },
  "confidence": {
    "value": {
      "param": {
        "type": "integer",
        "enum": [
           { "value": 5, "description": "5: The reviewer is absolutely certain that the evaluation is correct and very familiar with the relevant literature" },
           { "value": 4, "description": "4: The reviewer is confident but not absolutely certain that the evaluation is correct" },
           { "value": 3, "description": "3: The reviewer is fairly confident that the evaluation is correct" },
           { "value": 2, "description": "2: The reviewer is willing to defend the evaluation, but it is quite likely that the reviewer did not understand central parts of the paper" },
           { "value": 1, "description": "1: The reviewer\'s evaluation is an educated guess" }
          ],
        "input": "radio"
      }
    },
    "order": 4
  }
}
```

#### API V1 JSON

```json
 {
  "title": {
      "order": 1,
      "value-regex": ".{0,500}",
      "description": "Brief summary of your review.",
      "required": true
  },
  "review": {
      "order": 2,
      "value-regex": "[\\S\\s]{1,200000}",
      "description": "Please provide an evaluation of the quality, clarity, originality and significance of this work, including a list of its pros and cons (max 200000 characters). Add formatting using Markdown and formulas using LaTeX. For more information see https://openreview.net/faq",
      "required": true,
      "markdown": true
  },
  "rating": {
      "order": 3,
      "value-dropdown": [
          "10: Top 5% of accepted papers, seminal paper",
          "9: Top 15% of accepted papers, strong accept",
          "8: Top 50% of accepted papers, clear accept",
          "7: Good paper, accept",
          "6: Marginally above acceptance threshold",
          "5: Marginally below acceptance threshold",
          "4: Ok but not good enough - rejection",
          "3: Clear rejection",
          "2: Strong rejection",
          "1: Trivial or wrong"
      ],
      "required": true
  },
  "confidence": {
      "order": 4,
      "value-radio": [
          "5: The reviewer is absolutely certain that the evaluation is correct and very familiar with the relevant literature",
          "4: The reviewer is confident but not absolutely certain that the evaluation is correct",
          "3: The reviewer is fairly confident that the evaluation is correct",
          "2: The reviewer is willing to defend the evaluation, but it is quite likely that the reviewer did not understand central parts of the paper",
          "1: The reviewer's evaluation is an educated guess"
      ],
      "required": true
  }
}
```

#### Preview

<figure><img src="/files/RSwRsUWcMPhFenXn5Zj8" alt="Image of the default review form" width="563"><figcaption><p>Image of the default review form</p></figcaption></figure>


---

# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation

If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:

```
GET https://docs.openreview.net/reference/default-forms/default-review-form.md?ask=<question>
```

The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.