Comment on page
Default Review Form
{
"title": {
"value":
"param": {
"type": "string",
"regex": ".{0,500}"
}
},
"order": 1,
"description": "Brief summary of your review."
},
"review": {
"value": {
"param": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1,
"maxLength": 20000,
"input": "textarea",
"markdown": true
}
},
"order": 2,
"description": "Please provide an evaluation of the quality, clarity, originality and significance of this work, including a list of its pros and cons (max 200000 characters). Add formatting using Markdown and formulas using LaTeX. For more information see https://openreview.net/faq"
},
"rating": {
"value": {
"param": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
{ "value": 10, "description": "10: Top 5% of accepted papers, seminal paper" },
{ "value": 9, "description": "9: Top 15% of accepted papers, strong accept" },
{ "value": 8, "description": "8: Top 50% of accepted papers, clear accept" },
{ "value": 7, "description": "7: Good paper, accept" },
{ "value": 6, "description": "6: Marginally above acceptance threshold" },
{ "value": 5, "description": "5: Marginally below acceptance threshold" },
{ "value": 4, "description": "4: Ok but not good enough - rejection" },
{ "value": 3, "description": "3: Clear rejection" },
{ "value": 2, "description": "2: Strong rejection" },
{ "value": 1, "description": "1: Trivial or wrong" }
],
"input": "select"
}
},
"order": 3
},
"confidence": {
"value": {
"param": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
{ "value": 5, "description": "5: The reviewer is absolutely certain that the evaluation is correct and very familiar with the relevant literature" },
{ "value": 4, "description": "4: The reviewer is confident but not absolutely certain that the evaluation is correct" },
{ "value": 3, "description": "3: The reviewer is fairly confident that the evaluation is correct" },
{ "value": 2, "description": "2: The reviewer is willing to defend the evaluation, but it is quite likely that the reviewer did not understand central parts of the paper" },
{ "value": 1, "description": "1: The reviewer\'s evaluation is an educated guess" }
],
"input": "radio"
}
},
"order": 4
}
}
{
"title": {
"order": 1,
"value-regex": ".{0,500}",
"description": "Brief summary of your review.",
"required": true
},
"review": {
"order": 2,
"value-regex": "[\\S\\s]{1,200000}",
"description": "Please provide an evaluation of the quality, clarity, originality and significance of this work, including a list of its pros and cons (max 200000 characters). Add formatting using Markdown and formulas using LaTeX. For more information see https://openreview.net/faq",
"required": true,
"markdown": true
},
"rating": {
"order": 3,
"value-dropdown": [
"10: Top 5% of accepted papers, seminal paper",
"9: Top 15% of accepted papers, strong accept",
"8: Top 50% of accepted papers, clear accept",
"7: Good paper, accept",
"6: Marginally above acceptance threshold",
"5: Marginally below acceptance threshold",
"4: Ok but not good enough - rejection",
"3: Clear rejection",
"2: Strong rejection",
"1: Trivial or wrong"
],
"required": true
},
"confidence": {
"order": 4,
"value-radio": [
"5: The reviewer is absolutely certain that the evaluation is correct and very familiar with the relevant literature",
"4: The reviewer is confident but not absolutely certain that the evaluation is correct",
"3: The reviewer is fairly confident that the evaluation is correct",
"2: The reviewer is willing to defend the evaluation, but it is quite likely that the reviewer did not understand central parts of the paper",
"1: The reviewer's evaluation is an educated guess"
],
"required": true
}
}
Review
Last modified 1d ago